Another Stereotype of the Month entry:
Many Eyes Are Watching Tribal Gaming Casinos
On behalf of the 184-member Indian tribes of the National Indian Gaming Association, I write to express my disappointment with your Dec. 26 editorial "The Niagara Stakes." You disparage Indian gaming as being underregulated and as not benefiting "poor" Indian tribes. Once again, you are wrong about Indian gaming.
Indian Tribes spend $212 million annually to regulate Indian gaming at the federal ($8 million), state ($40 million) and tribal government ($164 million) levels. Tribal gaming regulatory agencies employ more than 2,800 professional gaming regulators and staff. Tribes employ top-notch professionals and use state-of-the-art surveillance and security equipment. In addition, the FBI and the Justice Department have jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute anyone, whether customer, employee or manager, who would cheat or defraud an Indian gaming facility.
You claim Indian gaming does not benefit "the poor Indians." The truth is, Indian gaming is building schools and health clinics and funding essential governmental services throughout Indian country. In North and South Dakota, for example, Indian gaming generates about 7,000 jobs, mostly for Indian people — many of whom had no previous steady, full time employment. Nationwide, Indian gaming generates 300,000 jobs.
Ernest L. Stevens Jr.
National Indian Gaming Association
Updated January 8, 2003
The Wall Street Journal's notion that Indian gaming doesn't benefit "poor Indians" is ludicrous. Actually, it benefits Indians in several ways:
Since Indians are everywhere, it would be hard to develop an industry that didn't benefit them even a little. As I said, the idea is ludicrous on the face of it.
The Wall Street Journal's hatchet job on Indians
The facts about Indian gaming
. . .
All material © copyright its original owners, except where noted.
Original text and pictures © copyright 2007 by Robert Schmidt.
Copyrighted material is posted under the Fair Use provision of the Copyright Act,
which allows copying for nonprofit educational uses including criticism and commentary.
Comments sent to the publisher become the property of Blue Corn Comics
and may be used in other postings without permission.