A response to Terrorism: "Good" vs. "Evil":
A response to Terrorism: "Good" vs. "Evil":
Commments from our CEO:
In my last e-mail I was angry. Now I am angry and saddened.
My thoughts were emotional, not political or commercial.
I will stand by my conviction that those responsible should not walk with us on this planet. I will though take back the word 'annihilate', this was anger speaking from someone that has now cried for the victims of this attack.
This may surprise some people...I am only human.
Just as President Bush almost cried on CNN today, that does not make him less of a President. I as a CEO have the right to be angry, and to vent my emotion. This does not make me any less of a CEO or human. It makes me more of one.
Nick-
My diary comments can be found here:
http://www.coffeecup.com/attack/
Rob's reply
>> I will though take back the word 'annihilate', this was anger speaking from someone that has now cried for the victims of this attack. <<
Good. I'm opposed to annihilating whole countries. Genocide is nothing to advocate under any circumstances.
>> I as a CEO have the right to be angry, and to vent my emotion. This does not make me any less of a CEO or human. It makes me more of one.
Hmm. You may want to check with your Board of Directors on that point. They may disagree.
Advocating genocide to your mailing list may be good for sales in the short run, but I can't believe it's good for sales in the long run.
|
. . . |
|
All material © copyright its original owners, except where noted.
Original text and pictures © copyright 2007 by Robert Schmidt.
Copyrighted material is posted under the Fair Use provision of the Copyright Act,
which allows copying for nonprofit educational uses including criticism and commentary.
Comments sent to the publisher become the property of Blue Corn Comics
and may be used in other postings without permission.