Another Stereotype of the Month entry:
Indian Gaming: More Corrupt Than Ever
By Stephen Pizzo, News for Real. Posted on January 10, 2006.
When sleaze meets sleaze, magic happens. One glance across a crowded room, and they instantly recognize kinship. But when supersleaze teams up with supersleaze, a fusion-like chain reaction flashes to life, consuming everything in range.
And that's what happened when Jack Abramoff met Indian gambling.
Oh, I know the media is all atwitter over the political implications for ruling Republicans, but as usual, they are missing the soul of this saga — the political correctness and hypocrisy that surrounds Indian gaming.
Let me explain. I have no moral objections to most vices, including gambling, and when I can get away with it, I indulge in several vices myself. So the morality of gaming is not my beef with Indian casinos. It's what I learned way back in the 1980s about what's really going on behind all that helping the poor Indians blather.
While working on our savings and loans book "Inside Job" in 1986, my co-author, Mary Fricker, and I followed one of our S&L crooks to a small Indian reservation outside Palm Springs. It was the home of the Cabazons, the very tribe that took their case for gambling rights to the U.S. Supreme Court and won — sparking the Indian gaming revolution.
What we found there was unnerving, to say the least. Sure, there were Indians — about 25 of them — but they weren't in charge. Instead, a group of Los Angeles-based mafioso were running the operations, people with names like Rocco. The gaming operations were run by a non-Indian "management" company. They would front the money to build, maintain and operate the various gaming operations, with the promise that the tribe would get a share of the "profits" as calculated by Rocco and friends.
This is how Indian gaming began. After being chased out of Las Vegas and New Jersey by state and federal heat, the mob discovered Indian reservations. It was like a gift from the Mob Gods. One mobster testifying before Congress was asked how the mob viewed Indian reservations. He replied, "As our new Cuba."
That's because Indian reservations are sovereign nations within a sovereign nation. The mob could set up casinos, pay off tribal leaders and skim casino proceeds with impunity. If the FBI showed up, they had tribal security usher them out the gate, because they had no jurisdiction on reservation property.
During our short investigation of the goings-on at that Indio, Calif., Blazoning reservation:
* Three members of the tribe were found shot in the head a week after threatening to go public with corruption at the gaming facilities An illicit arms-sales operation was set up peddling machine guns
* The non-Indian head of the tribe's gaming management company, John Philip Nichols, was sent to prison on a hire-for-murder charge
* The S&L crook who led us to the reservation in the first place, and who had financed the tribe's high-stakes bingo parlor, was charged with running fraudulent insurance companies and running off with customer premiums
* The same fellow was later sued by the federal government for tens of millions in fraudulent loans he got from now-defunct S&Ls
There was more. And it's still going on.
We heard reports back then of similar activity on Indian reservations in Florida and Minnesota. Mobbed up management companies were rounding up their own tribes coast to coast. One operator was pitching so many tribes, he referred to his targets as "chief of the week" sessions.
Indian gaming proponents are quick to counter, "That was then; things have changed."
They've changed all right; they got smart. The likes of one-time Republican National Committee chairman Frank Farenkopf, and later, GOP lobbyist Jack Abramoff, stepped in. While Democrats saw Indian gaming as supporting another downtrodden minority, something "we have to put up with because of how we screwed the American Indians in the past," the GOP saw it another way. The GOP saw Indian gaming the same way the mob saw it: as a cash cow.
And so Indian gaming really is different now. It's bigger and even more corrupt. The mobsters were shoved into the closet and replaced out front by buttoned-down businessmen, men with the kind of connections that get things done — and without all that messy "batta bing, batta bang" stuff.
Not only could these guys bring big money and big influence to Indian gaming, but legitimacy, and even a reassuring glaze of morality. After all, would Jesus-boy Ralph Reed associate himself with something sleazy?
Farenkopf made the way safe for fellow Republicans, serving as president of the American Gaming Association. The ASA is the lobbying arm of the gaming industry. It formed in 1995, and hired Frank at a hefty $1 million-plus per year. For his keep, Frank took gambling's case directly to GOP bigwigs, even at the White House.
"He was the best hired gun that money could buy," said the Rev. Tom Grey, founder and executive director of the National Coalition Against Legalized Gambling. "There is no doubt that he plays a very skilled Washington game."
When Farenkoph argued his case to fellow Republicans, he surely pointed out two critical facts: 1) Gaming produces tons of free cash, and 2) Democrats have been getting most of the Indian gaming action.
From 1998 on, the GOP's share of Indian gaming revenues has steadily grown. But Farenkoph played by the rules, so Dems kept their lead, though it narrowed through 2004. It wasn't until Jack Abramoff blended political action with tried-and-true mob techniques that the GOP pulled past Dems.
I mention this because the only way to get to the bottom of a problem is to identify all the elements that created it in the first place. Sure, we need campaign finance reform, and we need lobbying reform as well. But we also need to admit that little has changed since the days when powerful white men set up trading posts on Indian reservations, traded their goods for cheap liquor they knew was poison to them, then, once hooked on hooch, proceeded to exploit them in every way imaginable.
That's all Jack Abramoff and Ralph Reed were doing: simply following in the footsteps of those hardy pioneers. Behind all the altruistic hoopla you hear today, Indian casinos are just the latest incarnation of the old exploitative reservation trading posts.
But don't expect anyone in Washington to admit that. Not the Democrats, who you can bet are rushing to assure gaming tribes — and those that want to join the party — that Dems hold no grudges about their little fling with GOP whores. The DNC brothel is right where it always was, and welcomes their indigenous constituents back with open arms — but do bring wallets.
And don't expect Republicans to say anything but the nicest things about Indian gaming for the next few years — and for free! Republicans must now do penance for golfing in Scotland on Indians' money, even as Abramoff and his pals gang-raped their tribal clients.
I don't argue that revenues from reservation casinos have helped some Indians. But I am quite certain that tribes never see the lion's share of the cash that flows through those operations. Non-Indian management and politicians do.
A final thought. Cash, in the quantities produced by gambling operations, always attracts two kinds of people: sleaze and politicians.
Stephen Pizzo is the author of numerous books, including "Inside Job: The Looting of America's Savings and Loans," which was nominated for a Pulitzer.
© 2006 Independent Media Institute. All rights reserved.
>> as usual, they are missing the soul of this saga — the political correctness and hypocrisy that surrounds Indian gaming. <<
As we'll see, Pizzo is the only one who's missed something.
See Political Correctness Defined for more on the "political correctness" charge.
>> There was more. And it's still going on. <<
Where? On the Cabazon reservation? I don't think so.
Note that Pizzo apparently can't name any Indian gaming operation that's corrupt now. He's talking in generalities because he has no specifics.
>> We heard reports back then of similar activity on Indian reservations in Florida and Minnesota. <<
That was then; things have changed. Let's hear a report of mob activity happening at an Indian casino now.
>> Indian gaming proponents are quick to counter, "That was then; things have changed." <<
Indeed we will. And Pizzo will prove the point for us.
>> And so Indian gaming really is different now. <<
Pizzo could've stopped right there and he would've been correct. Too bad he continued.
>> It's bigger and even more corrupt. <<
What, because of the Abramoff scandal? A scandal that involved only six of the 200-plus gaming tribes? A scandal that was the fault of Abramoff and the Congressmen he bought, not the tribes?
Is that what Pizzo considered more corrupt than a mob-controlled casino? He must be the only one who thinks the mob is a paragon of virtue compared to Congress.
>> The mobsters were shoved into the closet and replaced out front by buttoned-down businessmen <<
So Pizzo admits the mobsters are gone. Great. So the first half of his screed is irrelevant propaganda. It's meant only to scare readers using guilt by association. A few tribes were touched by the mob, but they aren't now, by Pizzo's own admission. But readers are supposed to think the mob-style corruption has grown rather than disappeared.
And what businessmen is Pizzo talking about, exactly? The heads of such major corporations as Harrah's and MGM Grand? Because they're the businessmen who are partnering in Indian casinos these days.
>> Not only could these guys bring big money and big influence to Indian gaming, but legitimacy, and even a reassuring glaze of morality. <<
In case Pizzo hasn't heard, gaming companies have operated for decades, before Indian casinos existed. They've been lobbying Congress for decades to help their properties in Las Vegas, Atlantic City, and elsewhere. Indian gaming has little or no connection with this nationwide record of gaming and lobbying.
If Pizzo is concerned about the corrupting influence of gaming dollars, why isn't he attacking companies like Harrah's and MGM Grand? If gaming produces "sleaze," then they (not Indian tribes) are the prime producers. Yet Pizzo is attacking Indian gaming, not gaming in general, even though (again) only a tiny fraction of tribes were involved with Abramoff.
>> After all, would Jesus-boy Ralph Reed associate himself with something sleazy?<<
No Indian tribe hired Ralph Reed to do anything. Abramoff funneled money to Reed's anti-gambling crusade without the tribes' knowledge. This has nothing to do with the running of casinos as a business and everything to do with the lobbying of corrupt politicians.
It's another example of guilt by association. Pizzo implies that tribes tried to buy Ralph Reed to associate themselves with his alleged decency. Actually, they didn't do anything of the sort; they had no contact with Reed.
Even Abramoff wasn't trying to associate the tribes with Reed. He was using Reed just as he used the tribes. Pizzo has misstated the situation to impugn the Indians' integrity and push his fraudulent case against Indian gaming.
>> It wasn't until Jack Abramoff blended political action with tried-and-true mob techniques that the GOP pulled past Dems. <<
Abramoff is a lobbyist, not a person involved in Indian gaming. No tribe asked him to do the illegal and immoral things he did. This is a lobbying scandal, not an Indian gaming scandal.
>> Behind all the altruistic hoopla you hear today, Indian casinos are just the latest incarnation of the old exploitative reservation trading posts. <<
Wow, that's a fact-free assertion. Again, Pizzo can't identify a single exploitative person except Abramoff, Again, Abramoff was the exploiter while the tribes were the exploitees.
So how does that make Indian gaming corrupt? If someone exploits you, you're as corrupt as he is?
To learn how how gaming isn't just a ripoff—how tribes are benefiting enormously from it—see Hard Evidence that Indian Gaming Works.
Indians don't see most gaming revenue?!
>> I don't argue that revenues from reservation casinos have helped some Indians. <<
Good, because you'd look even more ignorant if you did.
>> But I am quite certain that tribes never see the lion's share of the cash that flows through those operations. <<
I'm quite certain that Pizzo doesn't know what the hell he's talking about. And he hasn't presented a shred of evidence to support his claim.
Actually, IGRA mandates that no more than 30% of a tribe's revenues can go to an outside investor or management company. There have been only a couple of cases where tribes were accused of paying more than 30%. Again, that's a couple of cases out of two hundred-plus examples of Indian gaming operations. In virtually all of these cases, there are no overpayments to outsiders, no lobbying scandals, no mob influence or corruption.
>> Cash, in the quantities produced by gambling operations, always attracts two kinds of people: sleaze and politicians. <<
If that's so, we're still waiting for Pizzo's attack on the overall gaming industry. Hmm. According to Pizzo, it seem only Indians are corrupted by gaming, not white men. The word for that racially-specific accusation is "racist."
The facts about Indian gaming—corruption
. . .
All material © copyright its original owners, except where noted.
Original text and pictures © copyright 2007 by Robert Schmidt.
Copyrighted material is posted under the Fair Use provision of the Copyright Act,
which allows copying for nonprofit educational uses including criticism and commentary.
Comments sent to the publisher become the property of Blue Corn Comics
and may be used in other postings without permission.